Environment Archive

0

CRU emails hacked, man-made global warming a con shocker

What great news: someone has hacked the server and emails at the Hadley Centre’s Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University, strong proponents of man-made (anthropogenic) global warming.

The emails contain details on how to get round FOI requests, someone thinking it was “good news” that a leading sceptic had died (classy!) and this wonderful tid-bit:

“I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.”

Fraudulent scientific shenanigans indeed! Oh, by the way, it’s taxpayer-funded research as well – I understand that some more FOI requests have already gone in.

Here are some links on the story, which all should be required reading:

Unsuprsisingly, the mainstream media isn’t really reporting it, which is shameful. In addition to this fraudulent “science” being paid for by taxpayers, governments around the world are using this AGW as an excuse to raise taxes, to create complex carbon trading schemes (of which Al Gore is almost a billionaire off of) and some Labour twat has even suggestion a “carbon ration” for citizens in order to move about – usual Labour, restriction of freedom.

I always said it was a con, and hopefully now people will start to see that and be as mad as hell and not take it any more – the increased green taxes, made to feel guilty whenever they start up their car, that godawful advert on TV where the dad is reading that propaganda to his daughter, all that crap can stop.

Anthropogenic (man-made) Climate Change is a CON.

(That said, I’m all for reducing pollution, recycling things and solar panels – but not those sodding wind farms, they suck ass.)

Incidentally, here’s a telling picture of how the CRU have form for distorting data:

Cat’s out of the bag, methinks!

0

Awww, look at the cuddly – aaaiiiieeee!!!

Cuddly polar bears, eh?

A cuddly-wuddly polar bear...

The photo was taken by Gill Pittaway from Esprick, Lancashire for the Daily Telegraph Big Picture photography competition – nice photo!

Nice to see those endangered polar bears not clinging to icebergs and managing to eat ;)

The above is sarcasm: the photo of the polar bear clinging to the iceberg has been hijacked by the Greens, and polar bear numbers are actually increasing, giving Sarah Palin something to shoot, I guess :P

0

Climate change – a kindred spirit

At last, someone who thinks like me on the subject of climate change:

Think of the polar bears!

Damn hippies ;)

Edit: Goddamnit, it’s an April Fools joke – clicking on any link takes you to a “Save The Planet”-type site… Joking aside, I’m all for conservation and all that stuff, I just don’t believe the climate is changing due to us…

0

Conservatives = Green, or just naive?

I read with much dismay the Conservative’s proposals to further tax air travel, but at least I can take solace in the fact that the tabloids and broadsheets also find it a bit unsavoury. Frankly, I would expect this sort of proposal from Labour (more stealth taxes from Gordon Brown of course) and the Liberal Democrats (“let’s all live in caves”), as it shows the Climate Change reverence that’s unfortunately so commonplace. I find it odd that airlines do not pay tax of any sort on aviation fuel, and I’m sure that if they were, they’d pass that on to the customer.

Air travel is a bit of an oddity: blamed for dumping tons of CO2 into the atmosphere (oh no, CO2!), various taxes and controls may be placed upon them, and yet Labour are pressing ahead with airport expansions – isn’t that a tad hypocritical?

In case anyone wonders if I’m having a change of heart on climate, er, change, let me assure you: I still think it is a huge pile of methane-producing crap, peddled by people who have nothing else to believe in, or have a vested financial interest (grants, government subsidies for research, etc.), and it’s a useful tool to extract yet more tax. Hope that’s cleared it up for ya :)

0

Thoughts on The Great Global Warming Swindle

Well, did ya watch it? I did, found it very interesting but I guess my mind was already made up. The facts and figures were interesting, especially the (pre-supposed) link between sunspot activity and temperature (i.e. more sunspot activity = cooler temperatures). However, as I’ve said before, correlation is not causation, and it certainly opens up a debate.

But, that’s how science is meant to be, isn’t it? One theory is put forward, analysed, discussed, disproved (maybe), proved, another theory comes along, all sides discuss, and so on. However, if anyone speaks out against the Religion of Global Warming, er, Global Cooling, um Climate Change, they are denounced as heretics, as many of the scientists who have spoken out have found out to their cost.

As the programme had a obvious bias to disprove the Religion of Climate Change, I’m sure it cherry-picked data. That said, I learnt quite a few things: oceans absorb and give out CO2, more CO2 is produced by decaying leaves than by mankind, stuff like that ;) Al Gore was touched upon (uuhhhrrr), and his claim that CO2 and temperature are linked by examination if Arctic ice core samples is addressed. The only problem is, the more CO2 present, the colder it gets. Al Gore didn’t mention that, oddly enough.

There was also footage of some superb EOTW (End Of The World) porn courtesy of the BBC, happily scaring the crap out of you since 1974 - nothing grabs people’s attention like doom and gloom, eh? I am seriously going off the BBC for many reasons, their constant bleating about “it’s all your fault we’re hotting up” doesn’t help. Incidentally, here’s a blog post on how many miles the BBC fly around the world, makes for interesting reading. “Do as I say, not as I do”?

The programme also shows what a horrifying effect Climate Change is having on developing countries. In Africa, which has it’s own gas and oil, CC believers advocate the use of solar and wind power to drive electricity. In a health centre outside Nairobi, this edict means that the centre can either run lights or a refrigerator – but not both at the same time. Ace. Because electricity is not readily available (lack of infrastructure doesn’t help, obviously), people have to burn wood indoors for heat and cooking; smoke inhalation and related diseases kill many women and children. Now, I am no bleeding heart liberal, but watching an African mother toiling over a fire carrying her baby (therefore exposing baby to smoke) really shocked me. I believe Climate Change is used as an excuse for many things, but it looks like it’s being used to subjugate developing countries as well.

 To sum up, it was a very thought-provoking programme. Jump in with comments, please.

0

The Great Global Warming Swindle

If you’re not a selfish, car-driving, foreign-holiday-taking, global warming sceptic (I am), you might want to watch “The Great Global Warming Swindle” on Channel 4, Thursday night, 9pm (8th March, 2007). In it, people may have their slavish adherence to ideas and policies put forward by unelected, well-paid boffins questioned and adjusted. Climate change is just another excuse to tax the crap out of us, supported by scientists who are handsomely rewarded for their scaremongering.

 If you’re detecting a bit of anger here, you’re not mistaken. “Climate change” is used as an excuse for a lot of things: driving cars is bad, it causes climate change; you can’t go abroad on holiday, it causes climate change; you can’t have a second fridge in a garage because of climate change (I kid you not).

My boss recently said that climate change is a bit like religion (no kidding): in religion, the logical thing to do is lead a good and virtuous life and when you die, if there’s a God you get into heaven, and if there’s no God, well, you’ve lead a good and virtuous life. With climate change, you may as well do all the things you’re told just in case it is true and your actions save the planet. Here’s the problem: I want to be a sinner. I want my fast car, I want my foreign holidays and I resent being told what to do by a bunch of people who still wouldn’t be happy if we were all living in caves!!!

Anyway, rant over. Watch the programme, I await your comments.

PS: We use low energy light bulbs, recycle, switch lights off, have insulated our home, make our own compost (uuhhrrrr!), so I guess I’m hedging my bets a bit anyway ;-)  

0

Shenanigans at the IPCC – political summary written before evidence in

A good blog post here from Melanie Phillips – basically, the MSM is reporting on the fact that climate change is definitely all our fault, here’s what we should do, etc . What they’re is not reporting is the summary is merely for policy makers and the actual science won’t be in for three months, and should “support” the summary.

read more | digg story